Clear glass balls and matte rubber balls on white marble — a visual metaphor for the leadership prioritization framework by Catalyst Coach Academy

Glass Balls and Rubber Balls: The Coaching Framework Leaders Use to Prioritize What Actually Matters

May 01, 2026

Executive & Leadership Coaching  |  Coach Training & Education  |  Coaching Tools

By Jamie Slingerland, MCC | Co-Founder, Catalyst Coach Academy

One of the most common things I hear from leaders in coaching sessions is some version of this:

“Everything feels urgent. I can’t figure out what to focus on. I’m dropping things and I don’t know which things are okay to drop.”

It is a genuinely disorienting place to be — especially for high-achieving leaders who have built their identity around not dropping anything. Around being the person who handles it all, handles it well, and somehow keeps every plate spinning without letting any of them fall.

The problem is not that they are not trying hard enough. The problem is that they are treating everything as equally fragile. And when everything feels like it matters equally, nothing can actually be prioritized.

There is a framework I return to in coaching conversations more than almost any other tool I use. It is simple enough to explain in thirty seconds and deep enough to reorganize how a leader thinks about their entire professional life. It is called glass balls and rubber balls.

What the Glass Balls and Rubber Balls Framework Actually Is

The concept is straightforward. Imagine you are a juggler. You are juggling many balls at once — projects, responsibilities, relationships, deadlines, strategic initiatives, team needs, personal commitments. More balls than any one person can keep in the air indefinitely.

Now here is the question that changes everything:

Which of those balls are made of glass — and which ones are made of rubber?

🎻 Rubber Balls

If you drop it, it bounces. It comes back. You can pick it up. The situation recovers. Nothing is permanently damaged.

💎 Glass Balls

If you drop it, it shatters. It does not bounce. It does not come back in the same form. The consequences are real, lasting, and sometimes irreversible.

The work of prioritization — real prioritization, not just reordering a to-do list — is the work of knowing which is which.

Why This Is Harder Than It Sounds

If the framework is that simple, why do so many leaders struggle with it? Because most high-performing leaders have spent years in environments that treated everything like glass. Every deadline was urgent. Every request from a senior leader was critical. Every deliverable carried the implicit weight of professional consequence.

That conditioning does not disappear when you get promoted. It often intensifies. The higher you go, the more visible your choices become, and the more it can feel like every ball you are carrying is being watched — which means every drop feels catastrophic, whether it actually is or not.

There is also a perfectionism dimension that compounds this. Leaders who are wired for excellence — and most leaders who find their way into serious coaching are — have a deep resistance to the idea that anything in their domain should be less than excellent. Deliberately letting a rubber ball drop, even temporarily, can feel like failure. Like slipping. Like becoming someone who does not care.

It is not failure. It is strategy. And coaching is often where leaders first give themselves permission to think of it that way.

What Applying This Framework Actually Requires

Using the glass balls and rubber balls framework well requires three things that are harder than they first appear.

1. Honest Classification

Not everything you think is glass actually is. Some of the things leaders treat as glass balls — the email that needs a same-day response, the report that needs to be perfect before it goes out, the meeting that feels critical — are actually rubber. They would bounce if dropped. The consequences would be manageable. But because the leader has always treated them as glass, the reclassification requires a genuine examination of assumptions that have never been questioned.

In coaching, this often surfaces as a revelation. A leader realizes they have been treating a particular type of task as glass for years — and when they actually ask what would happen if this didn’t happen exactly as I’ve been doing it? — the honest answer is: not much. The ball is rubber. It always was.

2. Values Clarity

The glass balls in any leader’s life are almost always connected to what they genuinely value most — not what their job description says matters, not what their organization’s metrics track, but what they personally cannot drop without real consequence to the things they care about most.

For one leader, the glass balls might be the one-on-ones with their direct reports — the relationships that determine whether their team stays, grows, and performs. For another, it might be the strategic thinking time that their role increasingly demands but their calendar consistently squeezes out. For another still, it might be the hours they have committed to their family that are the first to go when pressure builds — and that, when examined honestly, are the most genuinely fragile thing they are carrying.

Knowing your values does not just tell you what matters. It tells you what is actually glass — for you, in your life, at this stage of your career.

3. Permission

This is the piece that coaching provides that most leadership frameworks do not. A leader can understand the glass balls and rubber balls concept intellectually and still be unable to act on it — because acting on it requires giving themselves permission to let certain things be less than excellent. To let a rubber ball drop without treating it as a referendum on their capability or their commitment.

That permission rarely comes from a framework alone. It comes from the kind of coaching conversation that examines the beliefs underneath the behavior — the assumption that everything must be handled at the same level, the fear of what it would mean about them if they let something go, the identity investment in being the person who never drops anything.

When those beliefs are surfaced and examined, the framework becomes usable. Not just understood — actually lived.

What This Looks Like in a Coaching Session

A leader comes into a session describing overwhelm. They have recently taken on expanded responsibilities. Their team has grown. Their scope has increased. Their inbox reflects a level of strategic responsibility they have not carried before. Everything feels urgent. They are behind on things they were not behind on before. They feel like they are failing — even though from the outside, they are navigating a significant transition with more capability than they are giving themselves credit for.

The coaching does not start with a to-do list audit. It starts with a question.

If you knew that some of these things could drop without real consequence, and some absolutely could not — which would be which? And what does your answer tell you about what you actually value?

That conversation — the one that moves from overwhelm to clarity, from everything-is-urgent to this-is-what-is-actually-glass — is one of the most practically useful things coaching can produce. Not because it gives the leader a new system. Because it helps them see their situation clearly enough to trust their own judgment about what matters.

That trust — in their own values, their own assessment, their own capacity to lead — is what was missing. Not a better prioritization method.

What This Has to Do With Coach Training

If you are reading this as a coach — or as someone considering coach training — here is what I want you to take from it. The glass balls and rubber balls framework is not the point of this post. The point is what this kind of coaching conversation requires of the coach.

It requires the coach to resist the pull toward advice. A coach who hears a leader describing overwhelm and immediately starts suggesting prioritization systems — have you tried time blocking? have you heard of the Eisenhower Matrix? — has moved from coaching to consulting. They have given the leader a tool rather than helping the leader discover what they already know.

It requires the coach to ask the question underneath the question. The leader who says “I don’t know what to prioritize” is usually actually saying “I don’t trust myself to let some things be less than excellent.” Those are different problems with different solutions. The coach who hears only the surface question produces only a surface answer.

It requires the coach to hold space for the values conversation — to follow the thread from overwhelm to clarity to identity to what this leader genuinely cares about most. That thread is where the coaching lives. The framework is just the door.

These are the capacities that ICF-accredited coach training develops — not as techniques, but as genuine skills. The ability to listen beneath the surface. To ask the question that opens the real conversation. To trust the client’s own wisdom rather than filling the space with the coach’s own answers. That is what coaching at the MCC level looks like in practice. And it is what we develop in every cohort at Catalyst Coach Academy.

The Question Worth Sitting With

Whether you are a leader reading this or a coach who works with leaders, here is the question this framework ultimately points toward:

What in your life is actually glass — and what have you been treating as glass that is actually rubber?

That question, taken seriously, does not just change how you manage your time. It changes what you understand about what you value. And that understanding — clear, honest, arrived at through genuine reflection rather than someone else’s framework — is the kind of clarity that coaching exists to create.

Related Reading

  • Executive Presence Starts on the Inside — And Most Leadership Development Gets This Backwards
  • Your Enneagram Type and Your Coaching Strengths — A Guide for Professional Coaches
  • Do You Need a Psychology or Therapy Background to Become a Coach?

Develop the Coaching Skills That Make This Possible

At Catalyst Coach Academy, our ICF-accredited programs develop coaches who can hold exactly the kind of conversation this post describes — the one that moves a leader from overwhelm to clarity, from surface-level prioritization to genuine values-based decision-making.

If you are working toward your ACC or PCC credential — or exploring whether coach training is the right next step for you — we would love to talk.

Schedule a 20-Minute Conversation with Jamie or Ruthie

No pressure. No pitch. Just a real conversation.

Jamie Slingerland, MCC is a leadership coach, ICF Mentor Coach and Assessor, and Co-Founder of Catalyst Coach Academy — an ICF-accredited coaching education program led exclusively by Master Certified Coaches.

Back to Blog